1. Wiebke, M., et al., Cooled storage of semen from livestock animals (part I): boar, bull, and stallion. Anim Reprod Sci, 2022: p. 106822.
2. Schulze, M., M. Jung, and B. Hensel, Science-based quality control in boar semen production. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2022. n/a(n/a).
3. Schulze, M., et al., Reprotoxic effects of fenpropimorph on the fertilizing potential of AI boars: A case study. Reprod Domest Anim, 2022. 57: p. 337-340.
4. Hensel, B., et al., Time of ovulation in sows is not related to intravaginal dissolved oxygen levels or temperature. Livestock Science, 2022. 260: p. 104926.
5. Selige, C., et al., Effect of pasteurized egg yolk on the quality of cryopreserved boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim, 2021. 56(8): p. 1152-1155.
6. Schulze, M., et al., Suitability of semen stress tests for predicting fertilizing capacity of boar ejaculates. Theriogenology, 2021. 176: p. 73-81.
7. Paschoal, A.F., et al., Factors influencing the response of spermatozoa to agitation stress: Implications for transport of extended boar semen. Theriogenology, 2021. 175: p. 54-60.
8. Jakop, U., et al., Development of a new antimicrobial concept for boar semen preservation based on bacteriocins. Theriogenology, 2021. 173: p. 163-172.
9. Hensel, B., et al., Low temperature preservation: Influence of putative bioactive microalgae and hop extracts on sperm quality and bacterial load in porcine semen. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 2021. 19: p. 100359.
10. Bashawat, M., et al., Cooled storage of semen from livestock animals (Part II): Camelids, goats, and sheep. Anim Reprod Sci, 2021. 234: p. 106855.
11. Schulze, M., et al., Evaluation of a panel of spermatological methods for assessing reprotoxic compounds in multilayer semen plastic bags. Scientific Reports, 2020. 10(1): p. 22258.
12. Schulze, M., et al., Antibiotics and their alternatives in Artificial Breeding in livestock. Anim Reprod Sci, 2020. 2020: p. 106284.
13. Schulze, M., et al., Antibacterial defense in bull and boar semen: A putative link to the microbiome and reproductive strategy? Theriogenology, 2020. 157: p. 335-340.
14. Schulze, M., et al., Relationship between pubertal testicular ultrasonographic evaluation and future reproductive performance potential in Piétrain boars. Theriogenology, 2020. 158: p. 58-65.
15. Scheinpflug, K., et al., Relevance of Leptospira in boar and for the development of alternative antimicrobial concepts in boar semen preservation. Porcine Health Management, 2020. 6(1): p. 31.
16. Nitsche-Melkus, E., et al., Impact of hygiene on bacterial contamination in extended boar semen: An eight-year retrospective study of 28 European AI centers. Theriogenology, 2020. 146: p. 133-139.
17. Hensel, B., et al., Low temperature preservation of porcine semen: influence of short antimicrobial lipopeptides on sperm quality and bacterial load. Sci Rep, 2020. 10(1): p. 13225.
18. Waberski, D., et al., Application of preserved boar semen for artificial insemination: Past, present and future challenges. Theriogenology, 2019. 137: p. 2-7.
19. Schulze, M., et al., New trends in production management in European pig AI centers. Theriogenology, 2019. 137: p. 88-92.
20. Schulze, M., et al., Influences on thermo-resistance of boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 2019. 127: p. 15-20.
21. Schulze, M., et al., Antibacterial defense and sperm quality in boar ejaculates. J Reprod Immunol, 2019. 131: p. 13-20.
22. Kuhlgatz, D.A., et al., Development of predictive models for boar semen quality. Theriogenology, 2019. 134: p. 129-140.
23. Jakop, U., et al., In vitro supplementation with unsaturated fatty acids improves boar sperm viability after storage at 6 degrees C. Anim Reprod Sci, 2019. 206: p. 60-68.
24. Schulze, M., et al., Detection and characterization of Lactobacillus spp. in the porcine seminal plasma and their influence on boar semen quality. PLoS One, 2018. 13(9): p. e0202699.
25. Schulze, M., et al., Effect of production management on semen quality during long-term storage in different European boar studs. Anim Reprod Sci, 2018. 190: p. 94-101.
26. Schulze, M., et al., Effect of vibration emissions during shipping of artificial insemination doses on boar semen quality. Anim Reprod Sci, 2018. 192: p. 328-334.
27. Peter, S., et al., Influence of intrauterine administration of Lactobacillus buchneri on reproductive performance and pro-inflammatory endometrial mRNA expression of cows with subclinical endometritis. Sci Rep, 2018. 8(1): p. 5473.
28. Mense, K., et al., Increased concentrations of insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-2, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-4 are associated with fetal mortality in pregnant cows. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2018. 9(310).
29. Luther, A., et al., Irradiation of semen doses with LED-based red light in a photo chamber does not improve in vitro quality of thermically stressed boar spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim, 2018. 53(4): p. 1016-1019.
30. Schulze, M., et al., Research in reproduction - new ways to ensure sperm quality in artificial insemination of swine. Züchtungskunde, 2017. 89(1): p. 22-28.
31. Schulze, M., et al., Dose rates of antimicrobial substances in boar semen preservation-time to establish new protocols. Reprod Domest Anim, 2017. 52(3): p. 397-402.
32. Schulze, M., et al., Impact of different dilution techniques on boar sperm quality and sperm distribution of the extended ejaculate. Anim Reprod Sci, 2017. 182: p. 138-145.
33. Schäfer, J., et al., Impact of holding and equilibration time on post-thaw quality of shipped boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci, 2017. 187: p. 109-115.
34. Ibrahim, M., et al., Bovine Endometrial Epithelial Cells Scale Their Pro-inflammatory Response In vitro to Pathogenic Trueperella pyogenes Isolated from the Bovine Uterus in a Strain-Specific Manner. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2017. 7: p. 264.
35. Schulze, M., et al., Liquid storage of boar semen: Current and future perspectives on the use of cationic antimicrobial peptides to replace antibiotics in semen extenders. Theriogenology, 2016. 85(1): p. 39-46.
36. Schulze, M., et al., Field study analysis of the influences of deworming regimens and housing conditions on parasites and sperm output in 21 European boar studs. Vet J, 2016. 209: p. 186-9.
37. Meyerholz, M.M., et al., Peripheral thyroid hormone levels and hepatic thyroid hormone deiodinase gene expression in dairy heifers on the day of ovulation and during the early peri-implantation period. Acta Vet Scand, 2016. 58(1): p. 52.
38. Ibrahim, M., et al., Increased mRNA expression of selected antimicrobial peptides around ovulation and during inflammatory processes in the bovine endometrium postpartum. Theriogenology, 2016. 86(8): p. 2040-53.
39. Gärtner, M.A., et al., Increased mRNA expression of selected pro-inflammatory factors in inflamed bovine endometrium in vivo as well as in endometrial epithelial cells exposed to Bacillus pumilus in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2016. 28(7): p. 982-994.
40. Schulze, M., K. Rüdiger, and D. Waberski, Rotation of boar semen doses during storage affects sperm quality. Reprod Domest Anim, 2015. 50(4): p. 684-7.
41. Schulze, M., et al., Use of refractometry as a new management tool in AI boar centers for quality assurance of extender preparations. Anim Reprod Sci, 2015. 152: p. 77-82.
42. Schulze, M., et al., Challenges and limits using antimicrobial peptides in boar semen preservation. Reprod Domest Anim, 2015. 50 Suppl 2: p. 5-10.
43. Schulze, M., et al., Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production. Theriogenology, 2015. 83(3): p. 430-7.
44. Riesenbeck, A., et al., Quality control of boar sperm processing: Implications from European AI centres and two spermatology reference laboratories. Reprod Domest Anim, 2015. 50 Suppl 2: p. 1-4.
45. Peter, S., et al., Puerperal influence of bovine uterine health status on the mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory factors. J Physiol Pharmacol, 2015. 66(3): p. 449-62.
46. Jung, M., K. Rüdiger, and M. Schulze, In vitro measures for assessing boar semen fertility. Reprod Domest Anim, 2015. 50 Suppl 2: p. 20-4.
47. Gärtner, M.A., et al., Detection and characterisation of Lactobacillus spp. in the bovine uterus and their influence on bovine endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. PLoS One, 2015. 10(3): p. e0119793.
48. Svetlichnyy, V., et al., Metabolic incorporation of unsaturated fatty acids into boar spermatozoa lipids and de novo formation of diacylglycerols. Chem Phys Lipids, 2014. 177: p. 41-50.
49. Speck, S., et al., Cationic synthetic peptides: Assessment of their antimicrobial potency in liquid preserved boar semen. PLoS One, 2014. 9(8): p. e105949.
50. Schulze, M., et al., Effects of cationic antimicrobial peptides on liquid-preserved boar spermatozoa. PLoS One, 2014. 9(6): p. e100490.
51. Schulze, M., et al., Influences on semen traits used for selection of young AI boars. Anim Reprod Sci, 2014. 148(3-4): p. 164-70.
52. Schulze, M., et al., Development of an in vitro index to characterize fertilizing capacity of boar ejaculates. Anim Reprod Sci, 2013. 140(1-2): p. 70-6.
53. Schulze, M., et al., Effects on boar semen quality after infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus: a case report. Acta Vet Scand, 2013. 55: p. 16.
54. Schulze, M., et al., Temperature management during semen processing: Impact on boar sperm quality under laboratory and field conditions. Theriogenology, 2013. 80(9): p. 990-8.
55. Rüdiger, K. and M. Schulze, Post-farrowing stress management in sows by administration of azaperone: Effects on piglets performance. J Anim Sci, 2012. 90(7): p. 2331-6.